Skip to main content

Raymond Williams' Concept of Culture Explained by Kalyani Vallath

Let's talk about Raymond Williams
Raymond Williams was a major theorist of the New Left movement. And the New Left denotes the liberal political approach of the 1960s and 70s in the West that engaged in issues like civil rights, women's rights, gay rights, etc. Raymond Williams laid the foundations of the interdisciplinary field of Cultural Studies.

Want to know a bit about his life? Raymond Williams was born in a working class family in Wales in 1921, just as modernism started. He studied at Cambridge, joined the Communist Party, and fought in the II World War. By the time he died in 1988, he had become one of the greatest theorists of the century.



Courtesy: https://raymondwilliams.co.uk/about/


Do you know his first major work?

Inspired by T.S. Eliot's essay Notes Towards a Definition of Culture (1948), he wrote the famous book Culture and Society (1958). Williams wrote this book at a time when "culture" was regarded as something that is spiritual, high and mighty. This approach segregated high culture from the popular and the ordinary, and was therefore against social equality and democracy. Instead, Williams asserted that (1) "culture is a whole way of life" and (2) culture means the arts and learning. For him, culture is not just a product of material conditions of society, but contributes to the production of economic and political development.

Williams held that democracy and culture should develop together, and analysed institutions of culture (such as literature, language, the press, education, etc). What were his conclusions? By analyzing the institutions of culture, he showed that
 how we describe, modify, exchange and preserve experience is fundamental to the development of culture and society.

Another essay of the same year

In 1958 itself, Williams wrote another seminal essay responding to Eliot, called "Culture is Ordinary". Here he asserts that Culture is democratic (and not elitist, like Eliot and Leavis thought it is).

The Long Revolution

In 1961 came another major work The Long Revolution. The long revolution in the title refers to how many coming generations will change culture and society. How is that possible? Through the increasing role of the popular and the democratic values in society which constitutes a continuing struggle for freedom and change in the society.

Dominant, Residual and Emergent Cultures

In The Long Revolution, Williams differentiated between dominant, residual and emergent cultures that are mediated by what is called "structures of feeling".

Now, what's structures of feeling?? The term "structures of feeling" refers to the different ways of thinking in different times in history, all conflicting with one another to attain dominance.


Dominant Culture refers to the clearly visible aspects of our practices and the ideas we articulate. For example, consumerism is a dominant aspect of American culture.


Residual Culture refers to the influences of old cultural practices that remain in traces in a modern culture. For example, there are residual traces of the Feudal culture in modern culture. Residual Culture is different from Archaic Culture, for the latter is completely abandoned and forgotten, while the former is still active in modern cultures.


Emergent Culture refers to the new cultural practices that are being constantly created in a modern culture by individuals and groups. This might turn out to be dominant or oppositional. The Beat culture appeared in America in the 1950s as Emergent and Oppositional, but turned to be Dominant eventually.


That brings us to the end of the First Part of the discussion on Raymond Williams.


Part Two will be another blog.
Meanwhile, you could check out my other activities and writings here.
This is an initiative of TES Education.

Comments

  1. Explained in way to understand easily.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually it's very simple and easy, not really erudite!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ma'am, erudite in the sense it lessens heaviness of jargons through simplicity and transparency. In a very positive sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mam, thank you sooo much.. this is so helpful.. I hope you write more of this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Important blog for exam perspectives. Thank you madam.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ma'am,
    As per the lectures of Prof: Rajendran sir, there is one more division known as 'Counter Culture' which is the extremity of Emergent Culture that they won't merge into the Dominant Hegemonic Culture, but stay in itself as violent forces that challenges the dominant ideologies. Hyperactive freaks that challenge the social norms of morality and well-being through misbehaviours and ecstatic habits like taking drugs and liquor and violently attacks social institutions do come under the realm of Counter Culture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Yeah Emergent Cultures can be Counted cultures. That's why i have the example of Beat generation. I am not sure if Raymond Williams talked about Counter culture. It's Rajendran's example.

      Delete
  7. But i dont like the description you have given: "Hyperactive freaks that challenge the social norms of morality and well-being through misbehaviours and ecstatic habits"... A person who knows cultural studies should never look at it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Informative notes mam

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stuart Hall's Circuit of Culture explained by Kalyani Vallath

We have already discussed Stuart Hall's concepts of Encoding and Decoding in an earlier blog post. That story does not end there. Courtesy: https://images.app.goo.gl/9G9VHXPxJQhxFG8QA A Later Model The Encoding-Decoding Model of Communication was later developed by Stuart Hall into the concept of Circuit of Culture which connects Communication and Cultural Capitalism.  This theory asserts that the the creation and propagation of Culture involves five processes: production, consumption, identity, regulation, and signification. What are these Processes? Production refers to making or inventing cultural products, reproducing and distributing them—and paying for all this labour. An example would be Television shows. Consumption refers to buying the products (subscribing and watching particular shows), using them, becoming  part of these products and the culture they represent—and paying for all this. Identity refers to all the agents involved with producing, ...

Stuart Hall's Encoding/Decoding explained by Kalyani Vallath

Culture Studies Term 1 Who introduced the terms Encoding and Decoding ? Encoding and Decoding denote a communication model developed by Stuart Hall in the 1973 essay titled "Encoding and Decoding in Television Discourse". Courtesy: https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/stuart-hall-and-the-rise-of-cultural-studies What theory are these terms  part of? These terms are part of Communication Theory as well as Reception Theory, that is, the theory of how an audience receives messages. In developing these terms, Stuart Hall was influenced by Semiotics, or the science of signs. Stuart Hall's theory of communication is part of Culture Studies because it shows how communication produces and reflects culture. What is Encoding/Decoding? In communication, a Sender "encodes" a message with meaning and the Receiver "decodes" the message and understands it. And what are Codes? Codes are a set of conventions used to communicate meaning. For examp...

Michel Foucault's Theories explained by Kalyani Vallath

We love Foucault 🤩 As you know, Foucault was a French philosopher who applied philosophy in sociology, culture, history, literature, psychology, and other Humanities. Courtesy: http://www.the-philosophy.com/foucault-power-knowledge Foucault stressed on subjective experience.👻 Within philosophy, one area particularly of interest to Foucault is phenomenology.  Phenomenology studies the world “as it is experienced by the human being” rather than the world “as it really exists, beyond experience.”  In other words, Foucault was interested in the subjective experience of things, rather than in the thing as an objective entity. Well, what exactly did Foucault do?👀💀🔥 Foucault studied not a subject, or discourse, but studied how that discourse came into being. Take madness, for example, which is one of the first discourses he studied.  He did not study the definition of madness, the various types of madness, how they can be cured, etc in the conventional...